Mental Health Evaluation Paper
FINAL PROJECT 7 emotionally capable of making an informed decision regarding participation in this study. Of the participants, 250 were male and 300 were female. Participants were selected from general hospitals, psychiatric hospitals, and hospitals claiming "other specialty". The criteria for the study were previous suicide attempts, drug abuse, and being admitted to a hospital for suicidality. Whether or not the hospitals conducted a mental health assessment was not a requirement for participation in the study, but this factor was considered.
Materials
Each participant met with a psychiatrist for a complete mental health assessment regardless of the hospital conducting one. This assessment sets the baseline for that participant. After the initial psychiatric evaluation each participant filled out a questionnaire that was created by the psychiatrist. Having a psychiatrist create the questionnaire gave the study validity, because the psychiatrist is a professional and expert in the area that was studied. Validity is necessary for good science and research.
Procedures...show more content...
The questionnaire was also given at the beginning of the study and at the end of the study. Collecting both of these at the beginning and the end of the study helped us see changes in the participant's health and well–being. This helped us determine if the study had been helpful to the population with whom we worked. The questionnaire covered current drug use, all suicidal ideations, suicide attempts, and current feelings on several subjects, such as the participants relationship with his or her family. Some sample questions from the questionnaire include: "On a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being the lowest score possible and 5 being the
Argument Reflection Paper
Thank you for reaching out to me about this. I am ecstatic to hear that you enjoyed your time at the camp, and that you are attempting to apply what you learned there in everyday life. First off, there is no need to beat yourself up about not understanding how to analyze everyday arguments. The types of arguments we use on a daily basis rarely follow the patterns that we taught you classify them by, so it is understandable that you might get confused when trying to analyze them. That being said, understanding how to deal with these arguments would be a very useful thing to know, so I am going to try my best to help you strengthen the three main skills of critical thinking. Which, of course, you know to be analyzing an argument, evaluating the premises for relevance, and evaluating the premises for truth. I am going to go step by step through an example of an everyday argument, which I have attached to this email, so that I can hopefully help you with your problem. We are going to first start with an analysis of the argument. Just to make it a little easier to understand, I am going to split this analysis into two parts. This first part is simple going to involve a surface analysis of the argument. We will determine the issue, conclusion, and premises. The second part will involve a somewhat deeper analysis. This will include diagraming the argument and determining the line of reasoning for each argument and sub argument. Determining if they are inductive/deductive and the
Argument Evaluation Paper
Obarikanemi Nwogu
10 October 2014
PHIL 203 A
Dr. Jennifer E. Rosato
Argument Evaluation Paper:
On the Mediator Removing His Main Cause of Doubt
In Meditations on First Philosophy by René Descartes, Descartes is the Meditator who has taken it upon himself to uncover real truth and disentangle it from fictitious ideas he may have been exposed to early in his life. In the Sixth Mediation, titled "Concerning the Existence of Material Things, and the Real Distinction between Mind and Body", the Meditator presents a final argument that he claims removes "the chief reason for doubting" presented back in Meditation 1, dealing with the inability to discern between the states of wakefulness and sleep. In this passage, the Meditator shares that "the...show more content...
He offers this criterion: "dreams are never joined by the memory with all the other actions of life, as is the case with those actions that occur when one is awake." When trying to distinguish between the two, man can communicate more details about other activities (such as time, temperature, motion, scenery, etc.) in the wake state then when simply dreaming. From the quote, it can deduced that the Meditator believes that memory is more active when one are awake, thus heightening its recall ability. Perception is clearer and more distinct, as well, which is a key component throughout the Meditation to indicate certainty of something as a fact (introduced in Meditation 2). The Meditator provides an example of someone suddenly appearing and then immediately disappearing, which is supposedly typical while dreaming. If this were to happen while awake, the specifics of this encounter with the "ghost" could be relayed ("where... [it came] from, where... [is it] now, and when...[it came]"). This "clear and distinct perception", coupled with the lack of "interruption with the whole rest of...life", aids in the classification of the experience as occurring when awake, and not while dreaming. He further suggests that harmony between the senses, memory, and intellect is another indicator
Argument Evaluation
1. Appeal to authority is when claims can be defended by appealing to sources that are supposed to know more than we do about a given topic. In short, someone with experience and knowledge is used to support a stance or argument. 2. The advantages of appeals to authority as evidence is that they can make your argument stronger if they are reliable and credible. The disadvantage are that authorities are often wrong, they disagree, they have bias, and they have prejudice. 3. A personal example of appeal to authority is when I was doing the pro argument evaluation. I had to do extensive research on the authors to see if their claims were valid and reliable. After researching, I came to the conclusion that three of the four authors were reliable
Argument Evaluation Essay
Argument Evaluation Essay: commercial Clash of Clans uses ethos were as Samsung uses logos to convince you to buy there product .Clash of Clans uses Liam Neeson well known face to promote their product.Samsung's commercial uses facts about their phone to convince you to buy their product. Both of the commercials introduce their product from the very beginning of the commercial. In the Clash of Clans commercial you can tell what the commercial is because in the beginning it show video games characters fighting.The Samsung commercial starts by introducing their product and stating what it does. Both products are very similar because their both electronical products .The Clash of Clans product is a video games app created for phones .Whereas
Monochromatic's Argument
EVALUATION
–argument in support of thesis
–defend, criticize, Some questions you might consider: does her argument succeed in getting to the desired conclusion? Which premises are the weakest points of the argument? What objections might be raised to these premises? Are there any ways that her argument could be bolstered to defend against such objections?
OBJECTIONS
In addition, the objection about the thought of experiment was stated that a person who has a monochromatic disease actually knows about visual colour experiences. The person with monochromatic also able to figure out what coloured things look like whether in real life or only in a visual kind of things. For example, Mary would recognize or detect the colours when she first
Evaluation Of A Good Argument
7.3 – Neutralization of the fallacy:
In paragraph 4 the author has violated the sufficiency criterion of a good argument. The author has violates the sufficiency criteria by committing the fallacy of false analogy. In paragraph 4 the author states, "In the mid 1940s – before publicly funded healthcare – my grand parents sold their car to pay the hospital bill related to my father's birth, so "purchasing" the birth of a child is nothing new." This is a wrong analogy. Just because you pay for hospital bill and cloning, does not make them the same. In one situation, two persons life is preserved, and in the other a person's life is changed. The author could have avoided this fallacy by not comparing these two totally different situations at all or giving an analogy that has the same situation as human cloning.
7.4 – Positive Critique:
In the fifth paragraph the author argues that the paternal and maternal linages are not the most important thing as what we identify ourselves with us humans, which is quite convincing. As his first premise he states, "Most people I know do identify with both their maternal and paternal lineages." As his second premise he states, "Dual heritage may be normal, but it is seems central to our conception of ourselves as humans." And as third premise he sates, "And identical twins seems none worse for the knowledge that they are not genetically unique individuals." Even though that was said that this argument is convincing, it is not without
Susan Neilson
English 1010–126717
Evaluation Argument
October 25, 2011
NASCAR Drivers Elite Athletes In 2011 Golden Tate, Detroit Lions wide receiver, tweeted that driving a car does not make someone athletic. In 2013 Donovan McNabb, retired NFL quarterback, made a comment that he did not consider Jimmie Johnson an athlete. The remarks were fueled when Jimmie Johnson, six–time champion in NASCAR's Sprint Cup Series, was nominated for Best Male Athlete at ESPN's Espy Awards in 2011. Merriam–Webster defines an Athlete as a person who is trained or skilled in exercises, sports, or games requiring physical strength, agility, or stamina ("Athlete" 1). Auto Racing is recognized as a sport by the Association of IOC Recognised International...show more content...
According to Potkanowicz, Edward S., and Ronald W. Mendel, racecar drivers heart rates have been recorded at 174.3 beats per minute (bpm), their bodies have endured repetitive g–loading up to 5.5 gravitational forces (g), and have withstand core body temperature of 102.2 degrees Fahrenheit (4). A normal heart for adults ranges between 60–100 bpm. Racecar drivers have to be aerobically fit to sustain elevated heart rates. The average human can only handle up to 5g before passing out. Upper body strength is required if drivers are to withstand the continuous blows of g–force that can reach above 5g. An average core body temperature for humans is 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit. To prevent heat stroke, drivers practice hot yoga to help acclimate their bodies to the heat and exertion they will encounter on the track. In auto racing drivers must withstand all physiological stresses of their sport, if they lack in on aspect it can put their life and the life of fellow drivers in jeopardy. "Talk to high level athletes about their tactical preparation on of performance, and inevitably the words "concentration," "attention," or "focus" will be part of the conversation." (Blumenstein 3). Elite Athletes undoubtedly are faced with psychological stress of performing their sport. In racecar driving those stresses can be heightened due the extreme nature of the sport. Racecar drivers are expected to multi–task at high level of speeds. They stay focused for long periods of time in
Essay about Evaluation of Football
Evaluation of Football
Football is a demanding sport and each player has different jobs, as there are many different positions. Each player in a different position needs particular skills that make him or her effective at playing in their chosen role. If players were to be played in a position that didn't use their skills to their full potential, then that player would not perform at a high level.
As a centre midfielder, I need to do the job that ensures that my team either regains possession of the ball before the opposition can shoot on goal, or keeps the ball in order to try and create a goal–scoring opportunity. I also have specific skills that make me effective at playing as a centre...show more content...
By tackling an opponent a midfielder then regains possession for his or her team, this can lead to an attack been made which could lead to a goal scoring opportunity. Tackling is an extremely important skill and can also be very effective.
* Anticipation– when an attacking opposition player is approaching, good anticipation tells us when to tackle and at what time. By having good anticipation players can tackle effectively and prevent themselves from committing fouls. Also when the ball has been played either on the floor or in the air, good anticipation allows us to intercept the pass or to judge when to head the ball.
* Heading– this skill can be very effective in both attacking and defending areas. If the ball is in the air heading is the best skill to use. Heading allows players to clear the ball from near their own area, to intercept an airborne pass, to pass to another player, or to head at goal and attempt to score. Like tackling heading is very effective and important for a midfielder.
* Passing– passing is probably the most important skill in football. Every player needs to be able to pass a ball. If a player cannot pass a ball properly then he or she puts their team at risk as they will most probably give away possession to the other team. As a midfielder, I
Critical Analysis of Ethical Relativism Essay
When it comes to moral dilemmas between cultures, there is a grey area that can sometimes make it difficult to resolve issues surrounding the dilemma. What is morality? How is it possible to know what is morally correct when cultures differ so vastly? To answer these questions, and many more regarding the moral dilemmas in the world, there are theories that have been developed to resolve them. One example is known as Ethical Relativism. Ethical Relativism has been developed on the basis that there is no common set of values that can apply to everyone, as there are an infinite number of cultures that exist and clash with each other. Morality is extremely relative, so the best way to solve a moral dilemma is by analysing the conditions of...show more content...
Ethical Relativism is necessary when dealing with moral dilemmas because morality is so subjective as a result of all the different types of cultures that exist. "Since people have different conceptions of what constitutes right action, they will identify different behaviour as moral and thus identify different moral traits" (Welch 516). It is not logical to have a set list of specific moral guidelines for every person in the world to follow because cultures clash and people grow up with different sets of moral values. Therefore, there are many moralities as opposed to just one universal morality and because of this, the relativist view is very tolerant. We cannot judge anyone outside of our own culture because standards vary between cultures. The other end of the moral spectrum would then be Absolutism. An absolutist believes that absolutely everyone should follow one set of moral guidelines when determining right from wrong. This is the opposite of what a relativist would think. Lets say we have an absolutist, Sally, and a relativist, Bob. Sally says it is very wrong to punch someone, no matter the circumstance. It is immoral to inflict pain on another person and therefore absolutely no one should be permitted to do so. On the other hand, Bob believes that under the right circumstance, it is not immoral to punch someone. Bob thinks that, if it
The Critical Evaluation Essay
Professor: Terry Hennessy
ENG: 102
20 September 2013
The Cover Letter
1. What is your purpose in writing this essay? In your response, explore the deeper meaning of this question. The goal is not just to complete the assignment but instead to convey a message. What do you plan to accomplish with this essay? What do you hope the reader takes away from this argument?
I believe the purpose in writing this essay was to give students the opportunity to evaluates someone's work and to see if we can look pass our own opinions and decide whether the person writing the article was able to convey their argument in a way that was understandable.
2. What did you learn from completing this assignment? Did you experience a new...show more content...
Murray uses logos to prove that women and men are the same when given the same opportunities to succeed. According to our reading, logos relies on sound logic to determine if a statement is true, as long as all the reasons "add up" to the conclusion (Driver, Gast, Lowman–Thomas). She hinted in her argument that women couldn't provide a lot of contributions to society because they were raised to be homemakers and not out in the workforce since that was a mans place. She believed that women were denied the opportunities to make an impact on society because they were limited in their education and upbringing. All the information presented in her argument was valid and it shows that one cannot truly conclude who the superior sex is based on gender. Both sexes have the ability to be great and all it takes providing both gender with the opportunities they need to excel in life.
Murray's argument was very successful because it allows the reader to see what changes needed to be made in order to make the genders play on a leveled playing field and be completely equal. Although equality of the sexes is what most people want, it will never happen unless society removes the stigma placed on women, which make her nothing more than a simple housewife that just here to have babies and serve her man. The void that women felt back in the 1700s, is the same void some women feel today and
How To Write An Evaluation Argument
First of all, the authors name are Lester Faigley and Jack Selzer. They wrote about the evaluation arguments on the good reasons researching and writing effective arguments book in 2014. Firstly, there are many kinds of argument but, one of them is evaluation arguments . The evaluation arguments focus on what we value. The criteria is very important and it should convince the audience so, the readers will agree.
The writer should introduce the person or the event he will talk about. Moreover, when the writer wants to write an evaluation argument he should decide wether it is good or bad and what side he will be with. Also, for sure there are many people will disagree so, the writer should know why they do not agree so he can improve his arguments
Performance Assessment Essay
Performance Assessment
Not since the development of the objective paper and pencil test early in the century has an assessment method hit the American educational scene with such force as has performance assessment methodology in the 1990s. Performance assessment relies on teacher observation and professional judgment to draw inferences about student achievement. The reasons for the intense interest in an assessment methodology can be summarized as follows: During the 1980s important new curriculum research and development efforts at school district, state, national and university levels began to provide new insights into the complexity of some of our most valued achievement targets. We came to understand the multidimensionality...show more content...
The purpose of this digest is to provide a summary of those attributes of sound assessments and the rules of evidence for using them well. The various ways the reader might take advantage of this information also are detailed.
THE BASIC METHODOLOGY
The basic ingredients of a performance assessment may be described in three parts (Stiggins, 1984): (1) the specification of a performance to be evaluated, (2) the development of exercises or tasks used to elicit that performance and (3) the design of a scoring and recording scheme for results. Each contains sub– elements within it. For example, in defining the performance to be evaluated, assessment developers must decide where or how evidence of academic proficiency will manifest itself. Is the examinee to demonstrate the ability to reason effectively, carry out other skills proficiently or create a tangible product? Next, the developer must analyze skills or products to identify performance criteria upon which to judge achievement. This requires the identification of the critical elements of performance that come together to make it sound or effective. In addition, performance assessors must define each criterion and articulate the range of achievement that any particular examinee's work might reflect, from outstanding to very poor performance. And finally, users can contribute immensely to student academic
Evaluation Argument
Barbara Eddins
Introduction to Philosophy 102
Dr. Roberts
February 28, 2013 The Substance to Life
I feel like the two most important days of your life is the day you were born and the day you find out why you were born. There are all kinds of theories of how life is supposed to be. People believe all sorts of things of how life will be like. I feel like everyone in the world was put on this plant for a reason. We may not always know why we were put here but I think that is the goal in life to figure out why and be the best person you can be and to fulfill that goal. I think that the substance of like to believe and have faith in God. There is a fine line for believing in God. I think we all have to pray to find our purpose that...show more content...
When one door closes another one opens.
I understand that everyone don't believe the same thing I do, nor will they ever. They believe that if there was a God so powerful why would let bad things happen, but that is where faith comes in. God says that he will never leave nor forsake you and I believe that will all of my heart. God is with you in the valley and on the mountain. God is with you even when you do not want him to be with you. He also loves you no matter what, even if you don't love him.
I know that everyone sins including me but that is why our God is so awesome because he forgives us for doing the bad things that we do in life. He lets us have freewill to choose what we want to believe. He does not make us believe in him but he wants us too.
The purpose of life I believe is to get to
Academic Essay: An Argument Analysis
According to Harvard College Writing Center in, "Overview of the Academic Essay," academic writing includes four major point that will help improve it such as a motive and idea, a thesis and development, the tension of an argument, and the structure of an argument. Your essay must have a motive and you should be encouraged and inspired to come up with your own authentic ideas. Your writing should not be boring summaries of readings or research, but much rather have a purpose, a reason to understand the writing. When you become engaged with the material, you start brainstorming ideas, finding readings interesting, and eventually produce writing that is worth having a meaning. Not all assignments will inform you what thesis you should arrive
Evaluation Argument 'Hills Like White Elephants'
Ernest Hemingway: Hills Like White Elephants A white elephant is an idiom for a valuable but burdensome possession, but also it means a rare and sacred creature. In Ernest Hemingway's short story Hills Like White Elephants, Hemingway uses an unborn child as a white elephant. This short story depicts a couple of an American man and young women at a train station somewhere in Spain. Hemingway tells the story from watching the couple from across the bar and listening to their troublesome conversation. Through overhearing the couple's conversation Hemingway uses dialogue to explain the couple's decision of an abortion operation. Hills Like White Elephants is a great example of Hemingway's rare use of dialogue. Hemingway compresses...show more content...
On one side it is dry with no tree, no shade, and long white hills; the other side had fields of grain, trees, and a river. At one point in the story the girl walks to the side full of life with the trees and river, but the man tells her to come back and not to think that way. This could mean that she wanted to keep the baby after seeing the beautiful landscape full of life while the man did not want her to think like that. While sitting at the bar the couple orders several drinks in a short period of time which could infer that the man has persuaded the woman to have the operation because if she planned on having the baby she probably would not drink alcohol. Therefore, the drinks have helped set the setting by showing how the couple will probably handle the situation of contemplating whether to have the surgery or not. Settings play a huge role in any story but in Hills Like White Elephants the setting can be interpreted many ways which Hemingway most likely wanted for the reader. Nearly any story has characters which are revealed through direct explanations by the author Hemingway uses several ways of revealing the characters in Hills Like White Elephants. In the story the two in the couple are clearly the main characters but the reader learns about the character through their dialogue and actions. The position of the man and woman on the decision of having the operation are clear but more about the two are revealed
My Argument Evaluation
When I received feedback on my work from both the instructor and my classmates I tried to take all of what was said into account. Considering no person is the same, they will all feel something different when they read the essay, I tried to make it so that it wasn't as direct and had more information within it to explain why I felt my argument was important. This way it is easier for the audience to read as it is written in a way that can hopefully work for everyone in one way or another.
The challenge I had when developing my argument was the digging I had to do to obtain articles that worked to help me make it valid. I needed some that supported what my argument was but was more than words written by a random someone, wanted articles from journals and other reliable sources. Also, the dates were important too as I didn't want to use...show more content...
I had not mentioned why it was important for others to see my view and how it would effective if they had. Using that feedback, I had included why seeing addiction as a disease can help with helping the person seek treatment. If its seen as a choice, we tend to be nasty to them making them feel worse. If they feel worse, they use more.
When I had initially shared a paragraph on the discussion board I hadn't included my sources at all. In the final paper, I made sure to cite everything that was not my own and placed all sources at the end of the paper so that every source is listed.
My sources helped my claim as they supported what I was stating about addiction. When saying that the addicts changes in ways, I had evidence of brain scans that showed differences in certain areas of the brain which also explained why the person would have a sudden change in behavior. Also, I had statistics to show that mental illnesses were a part of addiction. My biggest challenge was trying to get everything together in a way that flowed well and made
Teaching Argument Evaluation in An Introductory Philosophy Course
ABSTRACT: One of the greatest challenges in teaching an introductory philosophy course is convincing students that there are, indeed, reliable standards for the evaluation of arguments. Too often introductory students criticize an argument simply by contesting the truth of one of its claims. And far too often, the only claim in an argument that meets serious objections is its conclusion. For many students, the idea that an argument displays a structure which can be evaluated on its own terms is not very difficult to grasp. Unfortunately, the idea is grasped only in an abstract way, with insufficient appreciation of how structural problems manifest themselves in concrete...show more content...
The introductory philosophy student's inability to recognize argument structure presents us with a problem that cannot be addressed simply by "teaching logic." The problem that confronts us addresses a fundamental pedagogical concern: Our task is to instill in the student the habit of clear thinking. When we send our students out into the world, we have to make sure that they're prepared for it. This is not simply a matter of providing them with "tools." We've looked at logic that way – and we've approached teaching logic that way – for far too long. Certainly logic may be employed as a tool; it can serve as an incredibly powerful tool, as we who teach it know full well. But it's not logic per se that we should be concerned with in our introductory courses. We want to teach our students how to think clearly and responsibly. There is certainly a moral edge to this view of the situation, and the manner in which we approach our pedagogical concern will not be without further philosophical prejudice. Ours is Aristotelian. We have found that giving our students the basics of term logic serves our purpose well. We do not introduce it as a tool for argument analysis – a strong case can easily be made for the superiority of truth–functional logic in that respect – we present it, rather, in the way that a kindergarten teacher brings toys into the classroom. And we make it clear that term logic has limitations – it's not an all–purpose tool.
Common Propositional Argument Evaluation
On pages 164–175, we learn over the 8 common propositional argument evaluations. Every argument must be valid in order to pass the Proper Form Test. In the cases of fallacies, not every premise will support the conclusion making that argument invalid. The first argument we see is Denying the Disjunct, which involves two statements, in two forms, which can be explained through four forms. The first form is "If S1 or S2, not S1, therefore S2" (pg. 164). The second form is "If S1 or S2, Tf S1" (pg.164). This means that if the premise denies the disjunct, then the conclusion is false. We see this form because a disjunct is when a premise denies the conclusion. The second argument we see is the Fallacy of Affirming the inclusive Disjunct,...show more content...
If a disjunction is false, because of the alternatives presented then it is considered a false dichotomy. (pg.168). We are now presented with Affirming the Antecedent, whose form is " If S1, then S2, S1, tf, S2" (Pg.170). This is shown because if the first statement affirms or supports the second statement, then it affirms the antecedent. The statements do not contradict or deny each other. The next argument we see is the Fallacy: Denying the antecedent, which is when premise is conditional, but it denies the antecedent. The antecedent is the part of the statement we learned through facts of background knowledge, but if S1 denies S2, then the argument as a whole is invalid (pg.172). Denying the Consequent is not a fallacy, but it occurs when one premise is conditional, but it denies the consequent. Because the consequent is denied, then we know that the conclusion is denied as well. (pg.173). The form is "If S1, then S2, not S2, therefore, not S1." (pg.173) We know this through the proper form and true premise test, because the form indicates that it is invalid and the premises are false, so it fails the true premise test. The last argument we see is Tri–Conditional. This argument differs from the other arguments, because we are now using three statements to confirm if the premise are true. The form is " If S1, then S2, If S2, then S3, therefore If S1,
English 111 Evaluation Essay
English 111 introduces students to critical thinking and the fundamentals of academic writing. This is a prerequisite English class for higher–level English education. By the end of this course a student will have gained a great deal of practice in the craft of writing. This essay will evaluate the English 111 textbooks, essays, self–reflections, the instructor, and what I personally learned. The English 111 textbook had effective sample essays and diagrams of outlines. The Successful College Writing Textbook is the textbook used for the English 111 course. This textbook had great sample essays because they showed useful examples of transition words and phrases. These sample essays also gave a guideline for writing a proper essay. The diagrams in the textbook were extremely sufficient. The diagrams were of the outline of a certain essay. These were remarkably helpful when mapping out an essay. These sample essays and diagrams of outlines were excellent samples of writing. The essays in English 111 consist of an argument essay, compare and contrast essay, and a research essay. The argument essay is when you gather evidence and present a well–reasoned argument on a debatable issue. On this essay I chose to do an argumentative paper on abortion. I listed the issues with abortion and then stated my opinion. The main goal of an argument essay is setting out to persuade the reader to agree with your position on a topic. The purpose of a compare and contrast essay is to