Port Royal Essay
Port Royal was one of the first settlements established in British North America. Located in the Annapolis Valley of Nova Scotia, the settlement was founded by the explorer Samuel de Champlain in 1605 (Parks Canada 2011). It is obvious that the geography of the location was essential in its being chosen for the fort. The land on which the fort was built is flat, but on a peninsula, so one could see any invaders approaching by water. Port Royal is located on the Annapolis River of the Annapolis Basin in the Bay of Fundy. Because the fort was on the water, both the shipping and fishing industries were supported. The water of the nearby Allains River also both supported and powered a grain mill (Parks Canada 2011). The heavy forestation of the...show more content...
This could give the settlers time to either evacuate or prepare for battle. The original settlers had to rely on themselves for protection – they had their own gun powder magazine – but they lost possession of the fort less than ten years after they had first established it (Nova Scotia Canada 2016). For a second line of defense, the British began to build Fort Anne along the very high hills at the entrance to the Annapolis Basin in 1629, and the fort was added to by the French in 1943 (Nova Scotia Canada 2016). The armories themselves were partially concealed by the tall hills surrounding them, but cannons sat at the top of the hills. Any attacker would have to pass the fort in order to get to the settlement, and it was highly unlikely that any fleet would. The changes in possession of the settlement were political, not due to invasions after the construction of the fort. Fort Anne is located relatively near the settlement – a fourteen minute car drive today.
Obviously, the geography of the settlement of Port Royal ensured its survival until well into the 1700s. Although occupied by different countries, and even undergoing rebuilding, the location was essential in its creation, and provided the settlers with food, industry, and
Essay on Battle Royal, by Ralph Ellison
Battle Royal
If I had to pick one out of the many stories that we have read and say that it moved me the most, I would have to say that the story would have to be
"Battle Royal." The reason that the story did move me so was because of the author's keens use of symbolism. I intend to prove, using textual evidence, that through the use of symbolism, the author portrays a larger meaning than what is initially implied to the reader who does not thoroughly analyze the text.
Initially, the story seems to be about one black boy's struggle to get ahead in a prodominetly white society. He tries' to accomplish this goal by adhering to his grandfathers dieing words. His grand...show more content...
The only way for a black person to excel at that time was to conform to the white society. Any rebels that tried to stand up for their rights were mostly killed by anti–black groups such as the KKK.
There was one symbol in the story that stood out especially in my mind and that was the stripper. She was a tall blonde haired blue eyed woman with a tattoo of the American flag on her belie. I think that the stripper symbolized the perfect American white woman, something that a black man could strive his whole life to attain, but would never receive. This was a symbol of the many things that a white man could have, whereas a black man could not.
I believe that the blind folded boxing in the story is a representation of the blind hatred of blacks at the time this story took place. By blind hatred
I mean the ignorance of the people of the time who could hate a person for the color of their skin. The boxers in the ring wailed at each other, not knowing whom they were hitting or why, just that they had to fight. This was true in the white American society of the time because they didn't know the black people, they blindly sent blows of segregation without actually knowing each individual, but stereotyped a whole race as no good and as lesser beings simply for the color of their skin.
Another important symbol in the story that helps piece together my theory of the meaning of the story was
The British Royal Family
The
British
Royal
Family
Contents
Chapter 1. Introduction..............................................4–5
Chapter 2. In the United Kingdom...................................6 I. Public role and image.....................................6–7 II. Funding.........................................................7
Chapter 3. Royal styles and titles.....................................8 I. Royal styles and titles....................................8–11 II. The crown jewels........................................11–15 III. Peerages.................................................16–19
Bibliography.............................................................20
Introduction: The British Royal Family is the group of close relatives of the monarch of the United Kingdom. The term is also commonly applied to the same group of people as the relations of the monarch in her or his role as sovereign of any of the other Commonwealth realms, this sometimes at variance with official...show more content...
Senior members of the royal family often drive themselves instead of having a driver.
In a lengthy interview conducted by PBS prior to the death of Diana, Princess of Wales in August 1997, Max Hastings, editor of the Daily Telegraph between 1986 and 1995, discussed the impact of Andrew Morton's and Jonathan Dimbleby's biographies of, respectively, the Princess and Charles, Prince of Wales on subsequent news coverage of the Royal Family in the UK.
II. Funding:
Members of the Royal Family carry out public duties; these individuals receive an annual payment known as a Parliamentary Annuity, the funds being supplied to cover office costs.
These amounts are repaid by The Queen from her private funds.
Though always voluntarily subject to the Value Added Tax and other indirect taxes, the Queen agreed to pay taxes on income and capital gains from 1992, although the details of this arrangement are both voluntary and secret. At the same time it was announced that only the Queen and Prince Philip would receive civil list payments. Since 1993 the Queen's personal estate (e.g. shareholdings, personal jewellery, Sandringham House and Balmoral Castle) will be subject to Inheritance Tax, though bequests from Sovereign to Sovereign are exempt.
Royal styles and titles: I. Royal styles and titles:
The style His Majesty or Her Majesty (HM) is enjoyed by a king, a queen regnant, a queen consort, and a queen dowager. Use of the style His Royal Highness or Her Royal Highness (HRH)
Ralph Ellison's "Battle Royal" Essay example
Ralph Ellison's "Battle Royal" is a story about blindness and realization.
It's about conformity and uprising. "Battle Royal" is about wanting to please the very people who look at you as an inferior race. In this story, the narrator is moved from idealism to realism. He is awakened to a new world in which he finally sees the prejudice that exists and that is directed toward him.
The story begins with the narrator reminiscing about the day his grandfather died. His grandfather delivered a speech that would haunt his young grandson for years to come. The old man said "Son, after I'm gone I want you to keep up the good fight. I never told you, but I have been a traitor all my born days, a spy in the enemy's country ever since I gave up...show more content...
His motives are not for his safety, which shows that he ignorantly still believes that the white men care about him.
The scramble for money on the electric rug is a turning point in the story. He finally turns his focus away from his upcoming speech, and he is only worried about getting the gold pieces off of the rug. He loses control of his bodily functions due to the electric shocks, which turn the boys into animals. They start clawing each other and biting each other to get to the money, while the men watch howling with laughter and amusement. This is another example of the black boys and their physical humiliation being used as a source of entertainment. The protagonist starts trying to think of ways to get one of the white men onto the rug, which shows that he is not in awe of them as much as he was before. This shows that he is beginning to think of revenge towards his white adversaries. These actions also hint that he may be subconsciously aware of a meaning to his grandfather's words.
When the time finally comes for him to deliver his speech, he is flustered and extremely nervous. He can hardly talk because of the injuries that he has suffered. He is not really conscious of all that is going on around him. The men's antics do not stop though. They tease him and make him repeat himself.
Royal Proclamation Essay
The Royal Proclamation of 1763
The Royal Proclamation of 1763 was issued by King George III after the gain of French territory resulting from the French and Indian war. The proclamation prohibited the settlement of the land beyond the appalachian mountains in order to maintain peace with Indians and to prevent further casualties. Although the proclamation was made with the intention of protection the colonists, the colonists viewed it as oppression. It angered the colonists who wished to expand into new farmlands, as they believed that they, "...purchased the land with their blood in the most recent war" (The American Pageant, 113). Feeling defiant, the colonists decided to resist the proclamation and still expanded west.
Treaty of...show more content...
French and Indian Wars (1688–1763)
The French and Indian Wars is the American name for the series of wars that occurred in North America from 1688–1763. They included King William's War, Queen Anne's War, King George's war, and the French and Indian War, also known as the 7 years war. A major motive to the wars was the control of North American territory and especially Hudson Bay, which was very important to the fur trade business.
King William's War (1688–1697)
King William's War was the first of the French and Indian Wars. The war was caused due to the treaties and agreements made at the end of King Phillip's War not being followed. Another main component was control over the fur trade industry and supremacy of North America. King William's War was ended by the Treaty of Ryswick in 1697. The treaty gave back north American territorial gains during the war back to the original holders.
Queen Anne's War / War of Spanish Succession
Queen Anne's War was the second of the French and Indian Wars and was fought between 1701 and 1714. The main reasons for the war included the rivalry between France and England in America, a problem that was not solved by the Treaty of Ryswick in 1697. Two months after Queen Anne rose to the British throne, the three allied powers declared war on France on May 1702. The Treaty of Utrecht ended the war and gave Britain fur trading posts in the Hudson Bay area, Newfoundland, and Nova Scotia.
King
Royal Power Research Paper
Royal Power: Elizabeth's Contribution to Society
What if the government today could control the books society read, the TV they watched, and the religion they practiced? This was the case during 16th century England. During the 16th century, the monarch was a very powerful figure, being able to influence many issues of the time: religion, war, literature. Queen Elizabeth, and King James, used their power to make England a successful country during that period with much progress not only in war and exploration but also in literature and religion.
The monarch was a powerful figure directly controlling or influencing many issues of the time, and the actions they took would be seen as representative of county. When Elizabeth, a Protestant, eventually became queen, it was after her sister Mary who was a Catholic. She was pushed to marry a Protestant for an heir...show more content...
In the beginning, merchants and traders promoted exploration wanting to get spices from Asia (Sommerville). Another major motivation was to spread Christianity throughout the world. There were many attempts to find the shortest path to Asia, both through the Northeast and Northwest passage (Sommerville). While trying to find new paths through Asia, the English also colonized the New World (Sommerville). In 1578, Humphrey Gilbert received letters from Queen Elizabeth, giving him permission to colonize America. Nine years later, the first English person born on American soil was born, but when the English came to check on the colony after the Anglo–Spanish war, all the colonists were gone. In 1577, Francis Drake was sent by Queen Elizabeth to become the first person to circumnavigate the world, and he successfully did. By the 1600's, England became a major power in trade and colonization, controlling trade with the Indies and other parts of Asia using the East India Company, and colonizing much of the New
Essay about The British Monarchy
The British Monarchy
Nowadays, some scandals and salacious gossip that surrounded the royals seriously undermined the symbolism of the constitutional monarchy, which indirectly influenced the current political situation.
The issue to be discussed, as to if the advantages of the UK having a constitutional monarchy are greater than the disadvantages boils down to one fundamental question: if the present system of the government of the UK adapt to the present society? My answer is: no. In this essay, I will look at the two ideas and appropriate my answer.
The constitutional monarchy: an impartial symbolic head of state, and always acts on the advice of minister, especially of prime minister,...show more content...
People would ask: where is the model of family? Where are the close family members? What we saw is thousands of people cry for the death of Diana, thousands of people take flowers to mourn Diana, but they are not relatives of Diana. People disappoint to the queen and other royals.
Other supporters would say the pomp and ceremony of royals pageantry is good for tourism and increases the revenue of the government. Maybe it is true. However, if there are not a queen and other royals, will the visitors not go to Britain? I think visitors are more interested in old castles, churches and other sceneries than some person. If we need to put some people who look like royals in castles or halls, we can ask for some actors instead, and it will be cheaper. We just need to give them some payment, and the actors will pay their income tax. Now, what about the true royal family? The civil list–an annual grant from Parliament, by 2000 almost ₤8 million –pays for the personal income and households of leading members of the royal family, but not for the upkeep of the royal estates, train, plane, horses, etc.which bring the total cost close to ₤100 million. The monarch is a drain on resources and the royals do very little.
We are told all are servants of the Crown: judges, ministers and bureaucrats, and we are all equal under the Crown
Royal Bodies
Royal Bodies
"Royal Bodies" is a speech by Hilary Mantel, an award winning and bestselling English writer. Hilary Mantel, born in 1952, is particularly famous for her historical novels. On February 21 2013, at a book lecture at the British Museum, she held a speech, in which she commented on the British monarchy.
Hilary Mantel starts her speech by telling how she, last summer, was asked to name a famous person and choose a book to give them. She chose Kate, the Duchess of Cambridge, "a jointed doll on which certain rags are hung". This is a good way to start the speech because Hilary Mantel has now introduced her real purpose with the speech: to discuss the effect of monarchy.
Hilary tells how she at a book trade event at...show more content...
In this quote she indicates that the royal family are like trapped caged animals that the public never really know, and that that is something perhaps to be regretted. The royal family is, according to Hilary, a thing that is expensive to conserve, but interesting to look at and that is also the only reason that they exist.
Today monarchy has become an attraction, which flashes every side of the royal family. Hilary Mantel believes that we are looking at royalties as if they were figures or dolls, who we can treat as we want to. We always have a comment to what they are wearing, if they look good or not, what they are doing right or wrong etc. We are allowing monarchy to treat its persons as entertainment objects.
"I'm not asking for censorship. I'm not asking for pious humbug and smarmy reverence. I'm asking us to back off not be brutes". In this quote Hilary says that we need to stand back, and this is clearly her goal with her speech. We need to allow the royalties to be humans as well.
Hilary Mantel's speech is tendentious and personal, because only one her own opinion is presented. Looked at the speech objectively it is weak because of the lack of proof, since she is only arguing with her own personal opinion.
In the speech there is an illustration of Paul Emsley's portrait of Kate Middleton. She describes it like this: "But in her first